Aerial forest
Research From blueprint to forest

From blueprint
to forest.

A four-phase research program. Two phases complete, two ahead. This page walks through the science, the choices behind it, and where we are today.

Last updated
2026 Q2
01 / 03

The four phases of the work.

A staged research program that takes a tree from genome to grove.
01.
Genome design

Mapping every targeted edit to maximize carbon capture, resilience, and ecological compatibility.

02.
Species selection

Native cultivars chosen for tropical, temperate, and boreal climates — each tailored to its biome.

03.
Lab synthesis

Bringing edits into living tissue, observing growth, and validating function. The phase we're now ready for.

04.
Field deployment

Pilot plantings, monitoring, and global scale partnerships with land stewards and reforestation networks.

01 · Genome maps
02 · Species survey
03 · Lab synthesis
04 · Field plantings
02 / 03

The approach.

Three principles that distinguish our research from conventional reforestation.
Precision biology

Edits, not inventions.

We don't introduce foreign DNA. We use CRISPR-based tools to adjust expression of genes a tree already has — turning up photosynthetic efficiency, accelerating lignin deposition, deepening root architecture.

Lab research Sequencing workflow · Reference lab
Leaf detail Leaf morphology · Field sample
Native-first

Local species, amplified.

We work exclusively with native species in each region. An engineered tree should still belong to the ecology it grows in — pollinators, fungi, and birds shouldn't have to learn it.

Open science

Published as we go.

We commit to publishing our methodology, our edit targets, and our results — including negative ones. Closed-door biotech doesn't build trust, and trust is the constraint that limits how fast this field can move.

03 / 03

A research note.

The longer version, for those who want it.
Note from the research lead

Most reforestation strategies focus on the planting — choosing species, sourcing saplings, securing land. The carbon math is straightforward and the bottleneck is logistical.

We're interested in a different bottleneck: the per-tree ceiling. A mature tree of a given species in a given climate has a fairly predictable carbon-absorption rate. Across millennia of evolutionary tuning, that rate represents a local optimum — not necessarily a global one.

Where the edits live

Our research focuses on three gene families: those governing RuBisCO efficiency (the enzyme responsible for fixing atmospheric carbon), those controlling stomatal density (the rate at which leaves exchange gas), and those regulating lignin biosynthesis (how durably carbon is stored in woody tissue).

Each of these has been studied for decades. What's new is the ability to make precise, multi-site edits in a tree species — and to do it in a way that the resulting organism remains fully native, fully fertile, and ecologically compatible.

Forest canopy from below
The same tree, a different ceiling

Local edits, global consequences.

Reference photograph
Old-growth canopy
"We're not engineering a new species. We're nudging an old one toward a different equilibrium."

Where we are today

Phases one and two — genome design and species selection — are complete. We have detailed edit maps for three target species, each chosen for a major climate zone. We've modeled expected carbon uptake under conservative assumptions and have a peer-review-ready document outlining the science.

Phase three — bringing the edits into living tissue — requires laboratory access. That is where we are now. The next page explains how we're approaching that, and how you can be part of it.

Read the ask →

Journal · Quarterly

Field notes, delivered.